Demographics details for Centralia, WA vs Beaver dam, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Centralia, WA vs Beaver dam, WI.
| Data | Centralia | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,773 | 16,582 |
| Median Age | 38.5 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $50,422 | $65,802 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Centralia vs Beaver dam
- In Centralia, the population is higher at 18,773, compared to 16,582 in Beaver dam.
- The median age in Beaver dam is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 38.5 years in Centralia.
- Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802, compared to $50,422 in Centralia.
- In Beaver dam, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 28.0% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- The unemployment rate in Centralia is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics Centralia vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Centralia | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 70 | 81 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Centralia vs Beaver dam
- In Beaver dam, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Centralia.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaver dam at 81% compared to 70% in Centralia.
- In Beaver dam, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Centralia.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Centralia at 17% compared to 8% in Beaver dam.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Centralia at 11% compared to 6% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Centralia and Beaver dam at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Centralia | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 27.5% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 19.2% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 23.5% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Centralia vs Beaver dam
- More residents in Centralia report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Centralia at 27.5% compared to 23.6% in Beaver dam.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Centralia at 19.2% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 15.9% in Centralia.
- Beaver dam has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 36.5% in Centralia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Centralia at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaver dam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Centralia | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (214) | 0.3% (47) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (3,312) | 23.8% (3,947) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (3,617) | 10.3% (1,706) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (2,187) | 18.2% (3,023) |
Education Levels Comparison: Centralia vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
- In Beaver dam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 17.6% in Centralia.
- More residents in Centralia have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 10.3% in Beaver dam.
- In Beaver dam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 11.6% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.