Demographics details for Centralia, WA vs Arlington heights, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Centralia, WA vs Arlington heights, IL.

Data Centralia Arlington heights
Population 18,773 75,195
Median Age 38.5 years 42.8 years
Median Income $50,422 $113,502
Married Families 28.0% 49.0%
Poverty Level 14% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.4 5.1

Population Comparison: Centralia vs Arlington heights

  • The population in Arlington heights is higher at 75,195, compared to 18,773 in Centralia.
  • The median age in Arlington heights is higher at 42.8 years, compared to 38.5 years in Centralia.
  • Arlington heights has a higher median income of $113,502, compared to $50,422 in Centralia.
  • In Arlington heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 28.0% in Centralia.
  • Centralia has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Arlington heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Centralia is higher at 5.4%, compared to 5.1% in Arlington heights.

Demographics

Demographics Centralia vs Arlington heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Centralia Arlington heights
Black 1 3
White 70 71
Asian 1 11
Hispanic 17 9
Two or More Races 11 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Centralia vs Arlington heights

  • In Arlington heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Centralia.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Arlington heights at 71% compared to 70% in Centralia.
  • In Arlington heights, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 1% in Centralia.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Centralia at 17% compared to 9% in Arlington heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Centralia at 11% compared to 6% in Arlington heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Centralia and Arlington heights at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Centralia Arlington heights
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% 12.3%
Physical Health Not Good 13.5% 7.8%
Depression 27.5% 17.3%
Smoking 19.2% 10.1%
Binge Drinking 15.9% 20.0%
Obesity 36.5% 25.4%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Centralia vs Arlington heights

  • More residents in Centralia report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 12.3% in Arlington heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Centralia at 27.5% compared to 17.3% in Arlington heights.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Centralia at 19.2% compared to 10.1% in Arlington heights.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Arlington heights at 20.0% compared to 15.9% in Centralia.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Centralia at 36.5% compared to 25.4% in Arlington heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Centralia at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Arlington heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Centralia Arlington heights
No Schooling 1.1% (214) 0.4% (329)
High School Diploma 17.6% (3,312) 10.5% (7,880)
Less than High School 19.3% (3,617) 5.0% (3,740)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.6% (2,187) 44.1% (33,171)

Education Levels Comparison: Centralia vs Arlington heights

  • A higher percentage of residents in Centralia have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Arlington heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Centralia hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 10.5% in Arlington heights.
  • More residents in Centralia have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 5.0% in Arlington heights.
  • In Arlington heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.1% compared to 11.6% in Centralia.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.