Demographics details for Centralia, IL vs Washington, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Centralia, IL vs Washington, KS.
| Data | Centralia | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,931 | 5,501 |
| Median Age | 40.7 years | 44.9 years |
| Median Income | $46,468 | $59,432 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Centralia vs Washington
- In Centralia, the population is higher at 11,931, compared to 5,501 in Washington.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 40.7 years in Centralia.
- Washington has a higher median income of $59,432, compared to $46,468 in Centralia.
- In Washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 33.0% in Centralia.
- The poverty level is identical in both Centralia and Washington at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Centralia is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.0% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Centralia vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Centralia | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | Data is updating |
| White | 79 | 93 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Centralia vs Washington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Centralia at 10% compared to 0% in Washington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Washington at 93% compared to 79% in Centralia.
- The Asian population is larger in Centralia at 2% compared to 1% in Washington.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Centralia and Washington at 4%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Centralia at 5% compared to 2% in Washington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Centralia and Washington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Centralia | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 42.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Centralia vs Washington
- More residents in Centralia report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.8% in Washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Centralia at 23.9% compared to 20.9% in Washington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Centralia at 22.7% compared to 18.8% in Washington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 20.4% compared to 16.4% in Centralia.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 42.1% compared to 41.1% in Centralia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 14.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Centralia | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (72) | 0.8% (45) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (2,243) | 24.9% (1,368) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (1,638) | 9.0% (494) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (1,494) | 15.8% (869) |
Education Levels Comparison: Centralia vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Centralia.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 18.8% in Centralia.
- More residents in Centralia have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 9.0% in Washington.
- In Washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 12.5% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.