Demographics details for Centralia, IL vs Taylor, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Centralia, IL vs Taylor, MI.
| Data | Centralia | Taylor |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,931 | 62,258 |
| Median Age | 40.7 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $46,468 | $59,352 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Centralia vs Taylor
- The population in Taylor is higher at 62,258, compared to 11,931 in Centralia.
- Residents in Centralia have a higher median age of 40.7 years compared to 37.9 years in Taylor.
- Taylor has a higher median income of $59,352, compared to $46,468 in Centralia.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Centralia and Taylor at 33.0%.
- The poverty level is identical in both Centralia and Taylor at 12%.
- Taylor has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 4.5% in Centralia.
Demographics
Demographics Centralia vs Taylor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Centralia | Taylor |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 21 |
| White | 79 | 63 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Centralia vs Taylor
- In Taylor, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 10% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 63% in Taylor.
- The Asian population is larger in Centralia at 2% compared to 1% in Taylor.
- Taylor has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 4% in Centralia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Taylor at 7%, compared to 5% in Centralia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Centralia and Taylor at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Centralia | Taylor |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 23.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Centralia vs Taylor
- More residents in Centralia report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.7% in Taylor.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylor at 25.0% versus 23.9% in Centralia.
- Taylor has a higher smoking rate at 23.8% compared to 22.7% in Centralia.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Taylor at 18.0% compared to 16.4% in Centralia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Centralia at 41.1% compared to 34.4% in Taylor.
- Disability percentages are higher in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Taylor.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Centralia | Taylor |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (72) | 1.0% (629) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (2,243) | 22.8% (14,189) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (1,638) | 17.2% (10,693) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (1,494) | 10.6% (6,622) |
Education Levels Comparison: Centralia vs Taylor
- In Taylor, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Centralia.
- In Taylor, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 18.8% in Centralia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylor at 17.2%, compared to 13.7% in Centralia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 10.6% in Taylor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.