Demographics details for Centralia, IL vs Shrub oak, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Centralia, IL vs Shrub oak, NY.
| Data | Centralia | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,931 | 3,002 |
| Median Age | 40.7 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $46,468 | $128,832 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Centralia vs Shrub oak
- In Centralia, the population is higher at 11,931, compared to 3,002 in Shrub oak.
- Residents in Centralia have a higher median age of 40.7 years compared to 36.6 years in Shrub oak.
- Shrub oak has a higher median income of $128,832, compared to $46,468 in Centralia.
- In Shrub oak, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 33.0% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Shrub oak.
- The unemployment rate in Centralia is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Shrub oak.
Demographics
Demographics Centralia vs Shrub oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Centralia | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 2 |
| White | 79 | 64 |
| Asian | 2 | 15 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Centralia vs Shrub oak
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Centralia at 10% compared to 2% in Shrub oak.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 64% in Shrub oak.
- In Shrub oak, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 2% in Centralia.
- Shrub oak has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 4% in Centralia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Centralia at 5% compared to 1% in Shrub oak.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Centralia and Shrub oak at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Centralia | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 25.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Centralia vs Shrub oak
- More residents in Centralia report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.2% in Shrub oak.
- Depression is more prevalent in Centralia at 23.9% compared to 19.7% in Shrub oak.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Centralia at 22.7% compared to 11.3% in Shrub oak.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shrub oak at 18.1% compared to 16.4% in Centralia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Centralia at 41.1% compared to 25.7% in Shrub oak.
- Disability percentages are higher in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Shrub oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Centralia | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (72) | 0.4% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (2,243) | 11.0% (330) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (1,638) | 12.9% (387) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (1,494) | 38.9% (1,168) |
Education Levels Comparison: Centralia vs Shrub oak
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Shrub oak.
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 11.0% in Shrub oak.
- More residents in Centralia have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 12.9% in Shrub oak.
- In Shrub oak, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 12.5% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.