Demographics details for Centralia, IL vs Fort payne, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Centralia, IL vs Fort payne, AL.
| Data | Centralia | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,931 | 14,879 |
| Median Age | 40.7 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $46,468 | $44,549 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Centralia vs Fort payne
- The population in Fort payne is higher at 14,879, compared to 11,931 in Centralia.
- Residents in Centralia have a higher median age of 40.7 years compared to 39.7 years in Fort payne.
- Centralia has a higher median income of $46,468 compared to $44,549 in Fort payne.
- In Fort payne, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 33.0% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Fort payne.
- The unemployment rate in Centralia is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.5% in Fort payne.
Demographics
Demographics Centralia vs Fort payne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Centralia | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 2 |
| White | 79 | 72 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Centralia vs Fort payne
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Centralia at 10% compared to 2% in Fort payne.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 72% in Fort payne.
- The Asian population is larger in Centralia at 2% compared to 0% in Fort payne.
- Fort payne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 4% in Centralia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Centralia at 5% compared to 4% in Fort payne.
- In Fort payne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Centralia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Centralia | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 21.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 16.1% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Centralia vs Fort payne
- In Fort payne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 19.0% in Centralia.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort payne at 26.0% versus 23.9% in Centralia.
- Fort payne has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 22.7% in Centralia.
- Binge drinking is more common in Centralia at 16.4% compared to 14.3% in Fort payne.
- Fort payne has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 41.1% in Centralia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 13.0% in Fort payne.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Centralia | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (72) | 2.7% (402) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (2,243) | 14.2% (2,110) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (1,638) | 27.9% (4,155) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (1,494) | 11.9% (1,767) |
Education Levels Comparison: Centralia vs Fort payne
- In Fort payne, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.6% in Centralia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 14.2% in Fort payne.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort payne at 27.9%, compared to 13.7% in Centralia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 11.9% in Fort payne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.