Demographics details for Centralia, IL vs Ephraim, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Centralia, IL vs Ephraim, WI.
| Data | Centralia | Ephraim |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,931 | 346 |
| Median Age | 40.7 years | 63.9 years |
| Median Income | $46,468 | $72,292 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 58.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Centralia vs Ephraim
- In Centralia, the population is higher at 11,931, compared to 346 in Ephraim.
- The median age in Ephraim is higher at 63.9 years, compared to 40.7 years in Centralia.
- Ephraim has a higher median income of $72,292, compared to $46,468 in Centralia.
- In Ephraim, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 33.0% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- The unemployment rate in Centralia is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Ephraim.
Demographics
Demographics Centralia vs Ephraim provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Centralia | Ephraim |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | Data is updating |
| White | 79 | 96 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Centralia vs Ephraim
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Centralia at 10% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ephraim at 96% compared to 79% in Centralia.
- The Asian population is larger in Centralia at 2% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Centralia at 4% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Centralia at 5% compared to 4% in Ephraim.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Centralia and Ephraim at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Centralia | Ephraim |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 7.7% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 11.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 25.7% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 31.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Centralia vs Ephraim
- More residents in Centralia report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 12.5% in Ephraim.
- Depression is more prevalent in Centralia at 23.9% compared to 21.1% in Ephraim.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Centralia at 22.7% compared to 11.2% in Ephraim.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ephraim at 25.7% compared to 16.4% in Centralia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Centralia at 41.1% compared to 31.7% in Ephraim.
- Disability percentages are higher in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 19.0% in Ephraim.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Centralia | Ephraim |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (72) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (2,243) | 4.3% (15) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (1,638) | 2.3% (8) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (1,494) | 59.5% (206) |
Education Levels Comparison: Centralia vs Ephraim
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Ephraim.
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 4.3% in Ephraim.
- More residents in Centralia have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 2.3% in Ephraim.
- In Ephraim, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 59.5% compared to 12.5% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.