Demographics details for Centralia, IL vs Cashion, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Centralia, IL vs Cashion, OK.
Data | Centralia | Cashion |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,931 | 892 |
Median Age | 40.7 years | 33.3 years |
Median Income | $46,468 | $96,705 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 58.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Centralia vs Cashion
- In Centralia, the population is higher at 11,931, compared to 892 in Cashion.
- Residents in Centralia have a higher median age of 40.7 years compared to 33.3 years in Cashion.
- Cashion has a higher median income of $96,705, compared to $46,468 in Centralia.
- In Cashion, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 33.0% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in Cashion.
- The unemployment rate in Centralia is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Cashion.
Demographics
Demographics Centralia vs Cashion provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Centralia | Cashion |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | 2 |
White | 79 | 53 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 22 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 22 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Centralia vs Cashion
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Centralia at 10% compared to 2% in Cashion.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 53% in Cashion.
- The Asian population is larger in Centralia at 2% compared to 0% in Cashion.
- Cashion has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 4% in Centralia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cashion at 22%, compared to 5% in Centralia.
- In Cashion, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Centralia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Centralia | Cashion |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 16.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 10.3% |
Depression | 23.9% | 24.0% |
Smoking | 22.7% | 15.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 41.1% | 36.9% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Centralia vs Cashion
- More residents in Centralia report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.5% in Cashion.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cashion at 24.0% versus 23.9% in Centralia.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Centralia at 22.7% compared to 15.4% in Cashion.
- Binge drinking is more common in Centralia at 16.4% compared to 15.9% in Cashion.
- Obesity rates are higher in Centralia at 41.1% compared to 36.9% in Cashion.
- Disability percentages are higher in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Cashion.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Centralia | Cashion |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (72) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 18.8% (2,243) | 25.8% (230) |
Less than High School | 13.7% (1,638) | 5.2% (46) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (1,494) | 24.4% (218) |
Education Levels Comparison: Centralia vs Cashion
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Cashion.
- In Cashion, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.8% compared to 18.8% in Centralia.
- More residents in Centralia have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 5.2% in Cashion.
- In Cashion, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 12.5% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.