Demographics details for Central square, NY vs San mateo, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Central square, NY vs San mateo, CA.

Data Central square San mateo
Population 1,852 100,984
Median Age 41.0 years 38.1 years
Median Income $58,824 $149,152
Married Families 45.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 8% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.4

Population Comparison: Central square vs San mateo

  • The population in San mateo is higher at 100,984, compared to 1,852 in Central square.
  • Residents in Central square have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 38.1 years in San mateo.
  • San mateo has a higher median income of $149,152, compared to $58,824 in Central square.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Central square at 45.0% compared to 44.0% in San mateo.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Central square and San mateo at 8%.
  • The unemployment rate in Central square is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.4% in San mateo.

Demographics

Demographics Central square vs San mateo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Central square San mateo
Black 1 2
White 97 32
Asian Data is updating 28
Hispanic Data is updating 25
Two or More Races 2 12
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Central square vs San mateo

  • In San mateo, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Central square.
  • Central square has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 32% in San mateo.
  • In San mateo, the Asian population stands at 28%, greater than 0% in Central square.
  • San mateo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 0% in Central square.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San mateo at 12%, compared to 2% in Central square.
  • In San mateo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Central square.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Central square San mateo
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 13.1%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 8.4%
Depression 26.8% 15.5%
Smoking 21.2% 8.7%
Binge Drinking 19.3% 16.2%
Obesity 40.3% 22.8%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Central square vs San mateo

  • More residents in Central square report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 13.1% in San mateo.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Central square at 26.8% compared to 15.5% in San mateo.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Central square at 21.2% compared to 8.7% in San mateo.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Central square at 19.3% compared to 16.2% in San mateo.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Central square at 40.3% compared to 22.8% in San mateo.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Central square at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in San mateo.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Central square San mateo
No Schooling 0.1% (1) 1.8% (1,834)
High School Diploma 14.2% (263) 8.2% (8,262)
Less than High School 11.0% (204) 11.5% (11,608)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.2% (356) 44.1% (44,508)

Education Levels Comparison: Central square vs San mateo

  • In San mateo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.1% in Central square.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Central square hold a high school diploma at 14.2% compared to 8.2% in San mateo.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San mateo at 11.5%, compared to 11.0% in Central square.
  • In San mateo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.1% compared to 19.2% in Central square.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.