Demographics details for Central square, NY vs Pharr, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central square, NY vs Pharr, TX.
Data | Central square | Pharr |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,852 | 80,179 |
Median Age | 41.0 years | 29.4 years |
Median Income | $58,824 | $45,016 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 24% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 7.6 |
Population Comparison: Central square vs Pharr
- The population in Pharr is higher at 80,179, compared to 1,852 in Central square.
- Residents in Central square have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 29.4 years in Pharr.
- Central square has a higher median income of $58,824 compared to $45,016 in Pharr.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central square at 45.0% compared to 34.0% in Pharr.
- The poverty level is higher in Pharr at 24%, compared to 8% in Central square.
- Pharr has a higher unemployment rate at 7.6% compared to 4.2% in Central square.
Demographics
Demographics Central square vs Pharr provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Central square | Pharr |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 97 | -26 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 94 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 31 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central square vs Pharr
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Central square and Pharr at 1%.
- Central square has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to -26% in Pharr.
- Both Central square and Pharr have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Pharr has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 94%, compared to 0% in Central square.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pharr at 31%, compared to 2% in Central square.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Central square and Pharr at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Central square | Pharr |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 16.5% |
Depression | 26.8% | 19.9% |
Smoking | 21.2% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 15.8% |
Obesity | 40.3% | 45.4% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central square vs Pharr
- In Pharr, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.8% in Central square.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central square at 26.8% compared to 19.9% in Pharr.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Central square at 21.2% compared to 17.0% in Pharr.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central square at 19.3% compared to 15.8% in Pharr.
- Pharr has higher obesity rates at 45.4% compared to 40.3% in Central square.
- Disability percentages are higher in Central square at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Pharr.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Central square | Pharr |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (1) | 2.1% (1,723) |
High School Diploma | 14.2% (263) | 13.2% (10,587) |
Less than High School | 11.0% (204) | 33.7% (27,024) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.2% (356) | 9.7% (7,741) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central square vs Pharr
- In Pharr, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.1% in Central square.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central square hold a high school diploma at 14.2% compared to 13.2% in Pharr.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pharr at 33.7%, compared to 11.0% in Central square.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central square hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 9.7% in Pharr.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.