Demographics details for Central square, NY vs Fishing creek, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Central square, NY vs Fishing creek, MD.

Data Central square Fishing creek
Population 1,852 235
Median Age 41.0 years 55.9 years
Median Income $58,824 $76,250
Married Families 45.0% 58.0%
Poverty Level 8% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Central square vs Fishing creek

  • In Central square, the population is higher at 1,852, compared to 235 in Fishing creek.
  • The median age in Fishing creek is higher at 55.9 years, compared to 41.0 years in Central square.
  • Fishing creek has a higher median income of $76,250, compared to $58,824 in Central square.
  • In Fishing creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 45.0% in Central square.
  • Central square has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The unemployment rate in Central square is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Fishing creek.

Demographics

Demographics Central square vs Fishing creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Central square Fishing creek
Black 1 Data is updating
White 97 100
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races 2 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Central square vs Fishing creek

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Central square at 1% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fishing creek at 100% compared to 97% in Central square.
  • Both Central square and Fishing creek have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Central square and Fishing creek at 0%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Central square at 2% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Central square and Fishing creek at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Central square Fishing creek
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 9.6%
Depression 26.8% 21.2%
Smoking 21.2% 15.1%
Binge Drinking 19.3% 16.8%
Obesity 40.3% 33.1%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 28.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Central square vs Fishing creek

  • More residents in Central square report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.3% in Fishing creek.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Central square at 26.8% compared to 21.2% in Fishing creek.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Central square at 21.2% compared to 15.1% in Fishing creek.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Central square at 19.3% compared to 16.8% in Fishing creek.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Central square at 40.3% compared to 33.1% in Fishing creek.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fishing creek at 28.0% compared to 18.0% in Central square.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Central square Fishing creek
No Schooling 0.1% (1) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 14.2% (263) 34.5% (81)
Less than High School 11.0% (204) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.2% (356) 16.2% (38)

Education Levels Comparison: Central square vs Fishing creek

  • A higher percentage of residents in Central square have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
  • In Fishing creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.5% compared to 14.2% in Central square.
  • More residents in Central square have less than a high school education at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Central square hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 16.2% in Fishing creek.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.