Demographics details for Central square, NY vs Apopka, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central square, NY vs Apopka, FL.
Data | Central square | Apopka |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,852 | 57,017 |
Median Age | 41.0 years | 38.9 years |
Median Income | $58,824 | $87,394 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Central square vs Apopka
- The population in Apopka is higher at 57,017, compared to 1,852 in Central square.
- Residents in Central square have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 38.9 years in Apopka.
- Apopka has a higher median income of $87,394, compared to $58,824 in Central square.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central square at 45.0% compared to 41.0% in Apopka.
- The poverty level is higher in Apopka at 9%, compared to 8% in Central square.
- The unemployment rate in Central square is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Apopka.
Demographics
Demographics Central square vs Apopka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Central square | Apopka |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 24 |
White | 97 | 30 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 27 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central square vs Apopka
- In Apopka, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 24% compared to 1% in Central square.
- Central square has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 30% in Apopka.
- In Apopka, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Central square.
- Apopka has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 0% in Central square.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Apopka at 15%, compared to 2% in Central square.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Central square and Apopka at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Central square | Apopka |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 15.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 11.1% |
Depression | 26.8% | 17.9% |
Smoking | 21.2% | 18.5% |
Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 14.7% |
Obesity | 40.3% | 29.8% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central square vs Apopka
- More residents in Central square report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.9% in Apopka.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central square at 26.8% compared to 17.9% in Apopka.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Central square at 21.2% compared to 18.5% in Apopka.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central square at 19.3% compared to 14.7% in Apopka.
- Obesity rates are higher in Central square at 40.3% compared to 29.8% in Apopka.
- Disability percentages are higher in Central square at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Apopka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Central square | Apopka |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (1) | 0.9% (499) |
High School Diploma | 14.2% (263) | 13.1% (7,455) |
Less than High School | 11.0% (204) | 12.3% (7,016) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.2% (356) | 23.4% (13,353) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central square vs Apopka
- In Apopka, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.1% in Central square.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central square hold a high school diploma at 14.2% compared to 13.1% in Apopka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Apopka at 12.3%, compared to 11.0% in Central square.
- In Apopka, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 19.2% in Central square.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.