Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Tavares, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Tavares, FL.
Data | Central point | Tavares |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,222 | 20,372 |
Median Age | 40.3 years | 54.6 years |
Median Income | $79,731 | $54,271 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Central point vs Tavares
- The population in Tavares is higher at 20,372, compared to 19,222 in Central point.
- The median age in Tavares is higher at 54.6 years, compared to 40.3 years in Central point.
- Central point has a higher median income of $79,731 compared to $54,271 in Tavares.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central point at 45.0% compared to 43.0% in Tavares.
- The poverty level is identical in both Central point and Tavares at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Central point is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Tavares.
Demographics
Demographics Central point vs Tavares provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Central point | Tavares |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 10 |
White | 76 | 71 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 15 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Tavares
- In Tavares, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Central point.
- Central point has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 71% in Tavares.
- In Tavares, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Central point.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central point at 15% compared to 11% in Tavares.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Central point at 7% compared to 6% in Tavares.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Tavares.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Central point | Tavares |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 17.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.6% |
Depression | 29.4% | 21.0% |
Smoking | 16.7% | 21.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 30.1% | 36.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Tavares
- More residents in Central point report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.0% in Tavares.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central point at 29.4% compared to 21.0% in Tavares.
- Tavares has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central point at 16.5% compared to 16.1% in Tavares.
- Tavares has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tavares at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Central point | Tavares |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (319) | 0.6% (125) |
High School Diploma | 16.1% (3,095) | 17.0% (3,458) |
Less than High School | 13.2% (2,530) | 16.9% (3,444) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (3,003) | 17.0% (3,457) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Tavares
- A higher percentage of residents in Central point have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.6% in Tavares.
- In Tavares, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tavares at 16.9%, compared to 13.2% in Central point.
- In Tavares, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 15.6% in Central point.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.