Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Russell springs, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Russell springs, KY.

Data Central point Russell springs
Population 19,222 2,750
Median Age 40.3 years 44.8 years
Median Income $79,731 $34,219
Married Families 45.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 10% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Central point vs Russell springs

  • In Central point, the population is higher at 19,222, compared to 2,750 in Russell springs.
  • The median age in Russell springs is higher at 44.8 years, compared to 40.3 years in Central point.
  • Central point has a higher median income of $79,731 compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Central point at 45.0% compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Russell springs at 15%, compared to 10% in Central point.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Central point and Russell springs at 4.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Central point vs Russell springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Central point Russell springs
Black Data is updating 1
White 76 88
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 15 3
Two or More Races 7 8
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Russell springs

  • In Russell springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Central point.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Russell springs at 88% compared to 76% in Central point.
  • The Asian population is larger in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Russell springs.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Central point at 15% compared to 3% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Russell springs at 8%, compared to 7% in Central point.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Russell springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Central point Russell springs
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% 20.7%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 15.6%
Depression 29.4% 29.0%
Smoking 16.7% 25.6%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 14.5%
Obesity 30.1% 40.3%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Russell springs

  • In Russell springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 19.4% in Central point.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Central point at 29.4% compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher smoking rate at 25.6% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Central point at 16.5% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Russell springs at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Central point Russell springs
No Schooling 1.7% (319) 0.7% (20)
High School Diploma 16.1% (3,095) 13.6% (375)
Less than High School 13.2% (2,530) 23.3% (642)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.6% (3,003) 18.4% (505)

Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Russell springs

  • A higher percentage of residents in Central point have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.7% in Russell springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Central point hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 13.6% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Russell springs at 23.3%, compared to 13.2% in Central point.
  • In Russell springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 15.6% in Central point.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.