Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Rockwood, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Rockwood, TN.
Data | Central point | Rockwood |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,222 | 5,538 |
Median Age | 40.3 years | 45.5 years |
Median Income | $79,731 | $43,309 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Central point vs Rockwood
- In Central point, the population is higher at 19,222, compared to 5,538 in Rockwood.
- The median age in Rockwood is higher at 45.5 years, compared to 40.3 years in Central point.
- Central point has a higher median income of $79,731 compared to $43,309 in Rockwood.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central point at 45.0% compared to 35.0% in Rockwood.
- The poverty level is higher in Rockwood at 15%, compared to 10% in Central point.
- The unemployment rate in Central point is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Rockwood.
Demographics
Demographics Central point vs Rockwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Central point | Rockwood |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 76 | 92 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 15 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Rockwood
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Central point and Rockwood at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rockwood at 92% compared to 76% in Central point.
- Both Central point and Rockwood have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central point at 15% compared to 1% in Rockwood.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Central point at 7% compared to 5% in Rockwood.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Central point and Rockwood at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Central point | Rockwood |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 21.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 15.9% |
Depression | 29.4% | 29.7% |
Smoking | 16.7% | 27.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 14.7% |
Obesity | 30.1% | 39.7% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Rockwood
- In Rockwood, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 19.4% in Central point.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rockwood at 29.7% versus 29.4% in Central point.
- Rockwood has a higher smoking rate at 27.1% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central point at 16.5% compared to 14.7% in Rockwood.
- Rockwood has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rockwood at 28.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Central point | Rockwood |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (319) | 0.6% (35) |
High School Diploma | 16.1% (3,095) | 24.6% (1,364) |
Less than High School | 13.2% (2,530) | 16.5% (915) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (3,003) | 7.8% (430) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Rockwood
- A higher percentage of residents in Central point have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.6% in Rockwood.
- In Rockwood, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.6% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rockwood at 16.5%, compared to 13.2% in Central point.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central point hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 7.8% in Rockwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.