Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Richmond hill, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Richmond hill, GA.
Data | Central point | Richmond hill |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,222 | 18,091 |
Median Age | 40.3 years | 31.0 years |
Median Income | $79,731 | $83,519 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Central point vs Richmond hill
- In Central point, the population is higher at 19,222, compared to 18,091 in Richmond hill.
- Residents in Central point have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 31.0 years in Richmond hill.
- Richmond hill has a higher median income of $83,519, compared to $79,731 in Central point.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central point at 45.0% compared to 35.0% in Richmond hill.
- The poverty level is identical in both Central point and Richmond hill at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Central point is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Richmond hill.
Demographics
Demographics Central point vs Richmond hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Central point | Richmond hill |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 13 |
White | 76 | 66 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 15 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Richmond hill
- In Richmond hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 0% in Central point.
- Central point has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 66% in Richmond hill.
- In Richmond hill, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Central point.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central point at 15% compared to 11% in Richmond hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richmond hill at 8%, compared to 7% in Central point.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Richmond hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Central point | Richmond hill |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 15.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 10.6% |
Depression | 29.4% | 21.8% |
Smoking | 16.7% | 14.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 30.1% | 34.4% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Richmond hill
- More residents in Central point report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 15.9% in Richmond hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central point at 29.4% compared to 21.8% in Richmond hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Central point at 16.7% compared to 14.2% in Richmond hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central point at 16.5% compared to 16.2% in Richmond hill.
- Richmond hill has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- Disability percentages are higher in Central point at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Richmond hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Central point | Richmond hill |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (319) | 0.0% (9) |
High School Diploma | 16.1% (3,095) | 7.7% (1,395) |
Less than High School | 13.2% (2,530) | 5.7% (1,037) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (3,003) | 19.5% (3,532) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Richmond hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Central point have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Richmond hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central point hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 7.7% in Richmond hill.
- More residents in Central point have less than a high school education at 13.2% compared to 5.7% in Richmond hill.
- In Richmond hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 15.6% in Central point.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.