Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Milroy, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Milroy, PA.
Data | Central point | Milroy |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,222 | 1,556 |
Median Age | 40.3 years | 44.6 years |
Median Income | $79,731 | $60,875 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Central point vs Milroy
- In Central point, the population is higher at 19,222, compared to 1,556 in Milroy.
- The median age in Milroy is higher at 44.6 years, compared to 40.3 years in Central point.
- Central point has a higher median income of $79,731 compared to $60,875 in Milroy.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central point at 45.0% compared to 42.0% in Milroy.
- Central point has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Milroy.
- The unemployment rate in Central point is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Milroy.
Demographics
Demographics Central point vs Milroy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Central point | Milroy |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 76 | 88 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 15 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Milroy
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Central point and Milroy at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Milroy at 88% compared to 76% in Central point.
- The Asian population is larger in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Milroy.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central point at 15% compared to 4% in Milroy.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Milroy at 8%, compared to 7% in Central point.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Milroy.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Central point | Milroy |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.3% |
Depression | 29.4% | 25.1% |
Smoking | 16.7% | 23.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 18.1% |
Obesity | 30.1% | 35.1% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Milroy
- More residents in Central point report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.6% in Milroy.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central point at 29.4% compared to 25.1% in Milroy.
- Milroy has a higher smoking rate at 23.5% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Milroy at 18.1% compared to 16.5% in Central point.
- Milroy has higher obesity rates at 35.1% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Central point and Milroy at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Central point | Milroy |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (319) | 0.8% (12) |
High School Diploma | 16.1% (3,095) | 34.2% (532) |
Less than High School | 13.2% (2,530) | 8.5% (132) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (3,003) | 11.4% (177) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Milroy
- A higher percentage of residents in Central point have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.8% in Milroy.
- In Milroy, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.2% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
- More residents in Central point have less than a high school education at 13.2% compared to 8.5% in Milroy.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central point hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 11.4% in Milroy.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.