Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Meadville, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Meadville, PA.

Data Central point Meadville
Population 19,222 12,680
Median Age 40.3 years 35.7 years
Median Income $79,731 $46,157
Married Families 45.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Central point vs Meadville

  • In Central point, the population is higher at 19,222, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
  • Residents in Central point have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
  • Central point has a higher median income of $79,731 compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Central point at 45.0% compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Meadville at 12%, compared to 10% in Central point.
  • Meadville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Central point.

Demographics

Demographics Central point vs Meadville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Central point Meadville
Black Data is updating 5
White 76 86
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 15 2
Two or More Races 7 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Meadville

  • In Meadville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Central point.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Meadville at 86% compared to 76% in Central point.
  • Both Central point and Meadville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Central point at 15% compared to 2% in Meadville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Central point at 7% compared to 6% in Meadville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Meadville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Central point Meadville
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 14.0%
Depression 29.4% 26.6%
Smoking 16.7% 24.2%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 16.6%
Obesity 30.1% 41.5%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Meadville

  • More residents in Central point report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 19.2% in Meadville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Central point at 29.4% compared to 26.6% in Meadville.
  • Meadville has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Meadville at 16.6% compared to 16.5% in Central point.
  • Meadville has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Central point Meadville
No Schooling 1.7% (319) 0.2% (29)
High School Diploma 16.1% (3,095) 24.5% (3,110)
Less than High School 13.2% (2,530) 8.6% (1,085)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.6% (3,003) 15.4% (1,953)

Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Meadville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Central point have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
  • In Meadville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
  • More residents in Central point have less than a high school education at 13.2% compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Central point hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.