Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Lost hills, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Lost hills, CA.
| Data | Central point | Lost hills |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,222 | 1,754 |
| Median Age | 40.3 years | 23.8 years |
| Median Income | $79,731 | $41,250 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Central point vs Lost hills
- In Central point, the population is higher at 19,222, compared to 1,754 in Lost hills.
- Residents in Central point have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 23.8 years in Lost hills.
- Central point has a higher median income of $79,731 compared to $41,250 in Lost hills.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central point at 45.0% compared to 32.0% in Lost hills.
- The poverty level is higher in Lost hills at 22%, compared to 10% in Central point.
- Lost hills has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Central point.
Demographics
Demographics Central point vs Lost hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central point | Lost hills |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 76 | -35 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 97 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 37 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Lost hills
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Central point and Lost hills at 0%.
- Central point has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to -35% in Lost hills.
- Both Central point and Lost hills have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Lost hills has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 97%, compared to 15% in Central point.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lost hills at 37%, compared to 7% in Central point.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Lost hills.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central point | Lost hills |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 19.8% |
| Depression | 29.4% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 20.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Lost hills
- In Lost hills, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 19.4% in Central point.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central point at 29.4% compared to 18.9% in Lost hills.
- Lost hills has a higher smoking rate at 20.9% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central point at 16.5% compared to 13.6% in Lost hills.
- Lost hills has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- Disability percentages are higher in Central point at 11.0% compared to 4.0% in Lost hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central point | Lost hills |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (319) | 3.7% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 16.1% (3,095) | 10.0% (175) |
| Less than High School | 13.2% (2,530) | 64.7% (1,134) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (3,003) | 0.9% (16) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Lost hills
- In Lost hills, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 1.7% in Central point.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central point hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 10.0% in Lost hills.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lost hills at 64.7%, compared to 13.2% in Central point.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central point hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 0.9% in Lost hills.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.