Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Ingalls, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Ingalls, MI.

Data Central point Ingalls
Population 19,222 150
Median Age 40.3 years 35.0 years
Median Income $79,731 $60,000
Married Families 45.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Central point vs Ingalls

  • In Central point, the population is higher at 19,222, compared to 150 in Ingalls.
  • Residents in Central point have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 35.0 years in Ingalls.
  • Central point has a higher median income of $79,731 compared to $60,000 in Ingalls.
  • In Ingalls, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 45.0% in Central point.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Central point and Ingalls at 10%.
  • Ingalls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Central point.

Demographics

Demographics Central point vs Ingalls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Central point Ingalls
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 76 90
Asian 1 5
Hispanic 15 Data is updating
Two or More Races 7 5
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Ingalls

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Central point and Ingalls at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Ingalls at 90% compared to 76% in Central point.
  • In Ingalls, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Central point.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Central point at 15% compared to 0% in Ingalls.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Central point at 7% compared to 5% in Ingalls.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Ingalls.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Central point Ingalls
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% Data is updating%
Depression 29.4% Data is updating%
Smoking 16.7% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.5% Data is updating%
Obesity 30.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 11.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Ingalls

  • More residents in Central point report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Central point at 29.4% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Central point at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Central point at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Central point at 30.1% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Central point at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Central point Ingalls
No Schooling 1.7% (319) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.1% (3,095) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 13.2% (2,530) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.6% (3,003) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Ingalls

  • A higher percentage of residents in Central point have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Central point hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
  • More residents in Central point have less than a high school education at 13.2% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Central point hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.