Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Foster, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Foster, OK.
| Data | Central point | Foster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,222 | 247 |
| Median Age | 40.3 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $79,731 | $68,871 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Central point vs Foster
- In Central point, the population is higher at 19,222, compared to 247 in Foster.
- Residents in Central point have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 38.8 years in Foster.
- Central point has a higher median income of $79,731 compared to $68,871 in Foster.
- In Foster, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 45.0% in Central point.
- The poverty level is higher in Foster at 12%, compared to 10% in Central point.
- The unemployment rate in Central point is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.5% in Foster.
Demographics
Demographics Central point vs Foster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central point | Foster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 76 | 73 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 20 |
| American Indian | 1 | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Foster
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Central point and Foster at 0%.
- Central point has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 73% in Foster.
- The Asian population is larger in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Foster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central point at 15% compared to 0% in Foster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Foster at 20%, compared to 7% in Central point.
- In Foster, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 1% in Central point.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central point | Foster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 29.4% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Foster
- More residents in Central point report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.5% in Foster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central point at 29.4% compared to 24.7% in Foster.
- Foster has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central point at 16.5% compared to 15.3% in Foster.
- Foster has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Foster at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central point | Foster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (319) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.1% (3,095) | 30.4% (75) |
| Less than High School | 13.2% (2,530) | 8.1% (20) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (3,003) | 22.3% (55) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Foster
- A higher percentage of residents in Central point have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Foster.
- In Foster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.4% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
- More residents in Central point have less than a high school education at 13.2% compared to 8.1% in Foster.
- In Foster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 15.6% in Central point.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.