Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Dickinson, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Dickinson, TX.

Data Central point Dickinson
Population 19,222 21,738
Median Age 40.3 years 35.8 years
Median Income $79,731 $81,739
Married Families 45.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 10% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.9

Population Comparison: Central point vs Dickinson

  • The population in Dickinson is higher at 21,738, compared to 19,222 in Central point.
  • Residents in Central point have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 35.8 years in Dickinson.
  • Dickinson has a higher median income of $81,739, compared to $79,731 in Central point.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Central point at 45.0% compared to 42.0% in Dickinson.
  • Central point has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Dickinson.
  • Dickinson has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.5% in Central point.

Demographics

Demographics Central point vs Dickinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Central point Dickinson
Black Data is updating 7
White 76 36
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 15 39
Two or More Races 7 17
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Dickinson

  • In Dickinson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in Central point.
  • Central point has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 36% in Dickinson.
  • Both Central point and Dickinson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Dickinson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 15% in Central point.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Dickinson at 17%, compared to 7% in Central point.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Dickinson.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Central point Dickinson
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% 17.2%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 12.3%
Depression 29.4% 22.7%
Smoking 16.7% 17.2%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 17.6%
Obesity 30.1% 36.5%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Dickinson

  • More residents in Central point report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.2% in Dickinson.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Central point at 29.4% compared to 22.7% in Dickinson.
  • Dickinson has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Dickinson at 17.6% compared to 16.5% in Central point.
  • Dickinson has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Central point and Dickinson at 11.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Central point Dickinson
No Schooling 1.7% (319) 1.9% (403)
High School Diploma 16.1% (3,095) 12.0% (2,607)
Less than High School 13.2% (2,530) 18.9% (4,116)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.6% (3,003) 15.8% (3,445)

Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Dickinson

  • In Dickinson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.7% in Central point.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Central point hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 12.0% in Dickinson.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Dickinson at 18.9%, compared to 13.2% in Central point.
  • In Dickinson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 15.6% in Central point.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.