Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Dickinson, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Dickinson, TX.
Data | Central point | Dickinson |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,222 | 21,738 |
Median Age | 40.3 years | 35.8 years |
Median Income | $79,731 | $81,739 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Central point vs Dickinson
- The population in Dickinson is higher at 21,738, compared to 19,222 in Central point.
- Residents in Central point have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 35.8 years in Dickinson.
- Dickinson has a higher median income of $81,739, compared to $79,731 in Central point.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central point at 45.0% compared to 42.0% in Dickinson.
- Central point has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Dickinson.
- Dickinson has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.5% in Central point.
Demographics
Demographics Central point vs Dickinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Central point | Dickinson |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 7 |
White | 76 | 36 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 15 | 39 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 17 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Dickinson
- In Dickinson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in Central point.
- Central point has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 36% in Dickinson.
- Both Central point and Dickinson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Dickinson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 15% in Central point.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Dickinson at 17%, compared to 7% in Central point.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Dickinson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Central point | Dickinson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 17.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 12.3% |
Depression | 29.4% | 22.7% |
Smoking | 16.7% | 17.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 30.1% | 36.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Dickinson
- More residents in Central point report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.2% in Dickinson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central point at 29.4% compared to 22.7% in Dickinson.
- Dickinson has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Dickinson at 17.6% compared to 16.5% in Central point.
- Dickinson has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Central point and Dickinson at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Central point | Dickinson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (319) | 1.9% (403) |
High School Diploma | 16.1% (3,095) | 12.0% (2,607) |
Less than High School | 13.2% (2,530) | 18.9% (4,116) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (3,003) | 15.8% (3,445) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Dickinson
- In Dickinson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.7% in Central point.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central point hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 12.0% in Dickinson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Dickinson at 18.9%, compared to 13.2% in Central point.
- In Dickinson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 15.6% in Central point.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.