Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Corinth, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Corinth, MS.
Data | Central point | Corinth |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,222 | 14,312 |
Median Age | 40.3 years | 42.1 years |
Median Income | $79,731 | $40,546 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Central point vs Corinth
- In Central point, the population is higher at 19,222, compared to 14,312 in Corinth.
- The median age in Corinth is higher at 42.1 years, compared to 40.3 years in Central point.
- Central point has a higher median income of $79,731 compared to $40,546 in Corinth.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central point at 45.0% compared to 32.0% in Corinth.
- The poverty level is higher in Corinth at 20%, compared to 10% in Central point.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Central point and Corinth at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Central point vs Corinth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Central point | Corinth |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 17 |
White | 76 | 72 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 15 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Corinth
- In Corinth, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Central point.
- Central point has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 72% in Corinth.
- The Asian population is larger in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Corinth.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central point at 15% compared to 5% in Corinth.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Central point at 7% compared to 5% in Corinth.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Central point and Corinth at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Central point | Corinth |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Depression | 29.4% | 23.5% |
Smoking | 16.7% | 21.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 14.7% |
Obesity | 30.1% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Corinth
- More residents in Central point report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.5% in Corinth.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central point at 29.4% compared to 23.5% in Corinth.
- Corinth has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central point at 16.5% compared to 14.7% in Corinth.
- Corinth has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Corinth at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Central point | Corinth |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (319) | 0.6% (80) |
High School Diploma | 16.1% (3,095) | 14.4% (2,059) |
Less than High School | 13.2% (2,530) | 22.8% (3,266) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (3,003) | 17.8% (2,547) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Corinth
- A higher percentage of residents in Central point have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.6% in Corinth.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central point hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 14.4% in Corinth.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Corinth at 22.8%, compared to 13.2% in Central point.
- In Corinth, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.8% compared to 15.6% in Central point.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.