Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Claremont, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Claremont, NC.
| Data | Central point | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,222 | 1,715 |
| Median Age | 40.3 years | 44.5 years |
| Median Income | $79,731 | $60,735 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Central point vs Claremont
- In Central point, the population is higher at 19,222, compared to 1,715 in Claremont.
- The median age in Claremont is higher at 44.5 years, compared to 40.3 years in Central point.
- Central point has a higher median income of $79,731 compared to $60,735 in Claremont.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Central point and Claremont at 45.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Claremont at 12%, compared to 10% in Central point.
- The unemployment rate in Central point is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Claremont.
Demographics
Demographics Central point vs Claremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central point | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 76 | 74 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Claremont
- In Claremont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Central point.
- Central point has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 74% in Claremont.
- Both Central point and Claremont have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central point at 15% compared to 10% in Claremont.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Claremont at 11%, compared to 7% in Central point.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Claremont.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central point | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 29.4% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 35.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Claremont
- More residents in Central point report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 16.8% in Claremont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central point at 29.4% compared to 25.9% in Claremont.
- Claremont has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Claremont at 19.2% compared to 16.5% in Central point.
- Claremont has higher obesity rates at 35.1% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Central point and Claremont at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central point | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (319) | 0.3% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 16.1% (3,095) | 27.6% (474) |
| Less than High School | 13.2% (2,530) | 10.7% (184) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (3,003) | 16.7% (287) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Claremont
- A higher percentage of residents in Central point have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.3% in Claremont.
- In Claremont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
- More residents in Central point have less than a high school education at 13.2% compared to 10.7% in Claremont.
- In Claremont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 15.6% in Central point.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.