Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Brundidge, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Brundidge, AL.

Data Central point Brundidge
Population 19,222 2,034
Median Age 40.3 years 49.9 years
Median Income $79,731 $37,627
Married Families 45.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 10% 20%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.0

Population Comparison: Central point vs Brundidge

  • In Central point, the population is higher at 19,222, compared to 2,034 in Brundidge.
  • The median age in Brundidge is higher at 49.9 years, compared to 40.3 years in Central point.
  • Central point has a higher median income of $79,731 compared to $37,627 in Brundidge.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Central point at 45.0% compared to 39.0% in Brundidge.
  • The poverty level is higher in Brundidge at 20%, compared to 10% in Central point.
  • The unemployment rate in Central point is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Brundidge.

Demographics

Demographics Central point vs Brundidge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Central point Brundidge
Black Data is updating 67
White 76 12
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 15 16
Two or More Races 7 5
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Brundidge

  • In Brundidge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 67% compared to 0% in Central point.
  • Central point has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 12% in Brundidge.
  • The Asian population is larger in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Brundidge.
  • Brundidge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 15% in Central point.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Central point at 7% compared to 5% in Brundidge.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Brundidge.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Central point Brundidge
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% 20.5%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 15.2%
Depression 29.4% 20.7%
Smoking 16.7% 23.1%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 12.2%
Obesity 30.1% 45.7%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 25.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Brundidge

  • In Brundidge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 19.4% in Central point.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Central point at 29.4% compared to 20.7% in Brundidge.
  • Brundidge has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Central point at 16.5% compared to 12.2% in Brundidge.
  • Brundidge has higher obesity rates at 45.7% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Brundidge at 25.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Central point Brundidge
No Schooling 1.7% (319) 0.5% (11)
High School Diploma 16.1% (3,095) 35.9% (731)
Less than High School 13.2% (2,530) 22.7% (461)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.6% (3,003) 11.8% (240)

Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Brundidge

  • A higher percentage of residents in Central point have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.5% in Brundidge.
  • In Brundidge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.9% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Brundidge at 22.7%, compared to 13.2% in Central point.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Central point hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 11.8% in Brundidge.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.