Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Bellwood, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Bellwood, IL.
Data | Central point | Bellwood |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,222 | 18,081 |
Median Age | 40.3 years | 36.5 years |
Median Income | $79,731 | $72,228 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Central point vs Bellwood
- In Central point, the population is higher at 19,222, compared to 18,081 in Bellwood.
- Residents in Central point have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 36.5 years in Bellwood.
- Central point has a higher median income of $79,731 compared to $72,228 in Bellwood.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central point at 45.0% compared to 31.0% in Bellwood.
- The poverty level is higher in Bellwood at 15%, compared to 10% in Central point.
- The unemployment rate in Central point is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Bellwood.
Demographics
Demographics Central point vs Bellwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Central point | Bellwood |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 74 |
White | 76 | -6 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 15 | 24 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Bellwood
- In Bellwood, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 74% compared to 0% in Central point.
- Central point has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to -6% in Bellwood.
- Both Central point and Bellwood have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Bellwood has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 15% in Central point.
- Both Central point and Bellwood have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Bellwood.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Central point | Bellwood |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.8% |
Depression | 29.4% | 14.7% |
Smoking | 16.7% | 16.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 15.1% |
Obesity | 30.1% | 39.0% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Bellwood
- More residents in Central point report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 15.1% in Bellwood.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central point at 29.4% compared to 14.7% in Bellwood.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Central point at 16.7% compared to 16.4% in Bellwood.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central point at 16.5% compared to 15.1% in Bellwood.
- Bellwood has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- Disability percentages are higher in Central point at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Bellwood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Central point | Bellwood |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (319) | 2.4% (434) |
High School Diploma | 16.1% (3,095) | 20.1% (3,635) |
Less than High School | 13.2% (2,530) | 14.3% (2,586) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (3,003) | 11.5% (2,077) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Bellwood
- In Bellwood, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.7% in Central point.
- In Bellwood, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.1% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bellwood at 14.3%, compared to 13.2% in Central point.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central point hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 11.5% in Bellwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.