Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Averill park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Averill park, NY.

Data Central point Averill park
Population 19,222 1,608
Median Age 40.3 years 53.3 years
Median Income $79,731 $109,746
Married Families 45.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 10% 4%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Central point vs Averill park

  • In Central point, the population is higher at 19,222, compared to 1,608 in Averill park.
  • The median age in Averill park is higher at 53.3 years, compared to 40.3 years in Central point.
  • Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746, compared to $79,731 in Central point.
  • In Averill park, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 45.0% in Central point.
  • Central point has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 4% in Averill park.
  • The unemployment rate in Central point is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Averill park.

Demographics

Demographics Central point vs Averill park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Central point Averill park
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 76 100
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 15 Data is updating
Two or More Races 7 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Averill park

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Central point and Averill park at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Averill park at 100% compared to 76% in Central point.
  • The Asian population is larger in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Central point at 15% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Central point at 7% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Averill park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Central point Averill park
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% 14.6%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 9.1%
Depression 29.4% 23.7%
Smoking 16.7% 15.9%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 21.5%
Obesity 30.1% 34.6%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Averill park

  • More residents in Central point report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 14.6% in Averill park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Central point at 29.4% compared to 23.7% in Averill park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Central point at 16.7% compared to 15.9% in Averill park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 16.5% in Central point.
  • Averill park has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Averill park at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Central point Averill park
No Schooling 1.7% (319) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.1% (3,095) 22.0% (354)
Less than High School 13.2% (2,530) 3.7% (60)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.6% (3,003) 32.3% (520)

Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Averill park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Central point have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Averill park.
  • In Averill park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
  • More residents in Central point have less than a high school education at 13.2% compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
  • In Averill park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 15.6% in Central point.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.