Demographics details for Central point, OR vs Amberg, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Central point, OR vs Amberg, WI.

Data Central point Amberg
Population 19,222 715
Median Age 40.3 years 43.0 years
Median Income $79,731 $50,000
Married Families 45.0% Data is updating
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.0

Population Comparison: Central point vs Amberg

  • In Central point, the population is higher at 19,222, compared to 715 in Amberg.
  • The median age in Amberg is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 40.3 years in Central point.
  • Central point has a higher median income of $79,731 compared to $50,000 in Amberg.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Central point at 45.0% compared to 0.0% in Amberg.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Central point and Amberg at 10%.
  • The unemployment rate in Central point is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Amberg.

Demographics

Demographics Central point vs Amberg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Central point Amberg
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 76 100
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 15 Data is updating
Two or More Races 7 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Central point vs Amberg

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Central point and Amberg at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Amberg at 100% compared to 76% in Central point.
  • The Asian population is larger in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Amberg.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Central point at 15% compared to 0% in Amberg.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Central point at 7% compared to 0% in Amberg.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central point at 1% compared to 0% in Amberg.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Central point Amberg
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% Data is updating%
Depression 29.4% Data is updating%
Smoking 16.7% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.5% Data is updating%
Obesity 30.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 11.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Central point vs Amberg

  • More residents in Central point report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in Amberg.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Central point at 29.4% compared to 0.0% in Amberg.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Central point at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Amberg.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Central point at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in Amberg.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Central point at 30.1% compared to 0.0% in Amberg.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Central point at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Amberg.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Central point Amberg
No Schooling 1.7% (319) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.1% (3,095) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 13.2% (2,530) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.6% (3,003) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Central point vs Amberg

  • A higher percentage of residents in Central point have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Amberg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Central point hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Amberg.
  • More residents in Central point have less than a high school education at 13.2% compared to 0.0% in Amberg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Central point hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Amberg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.