Demographics details for Central falls, RI vs Taylorsville, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Central falls, RI vs Taylorsville, GA.

Data Central falls Taylorsville
Population 22,490 258
Median Age 31.5 years 56.7 years
Median Income $43,092 $41,250
Married Families 29.0% 62.0%
Poverty Level 20% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 4.5

Population Comparison: Central falls vs Taylorsville

  • In Central falls, the population is higher at 22,490, compared to 258 in Taylorsville.
  • The median age in Taylorsville is higher at 56.7 years, compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
  • Central falls has a higher median income of $43,092 compared to $41,250 in Taylorsville.
  • In Taylorsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
  • Central falls has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 10% in Taylorsville.
  • The unemployment rate in Central falls is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.5% in Taylorsville.

Demographics

Demographics Central falls vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Central falls Taylorsville
Black 8 1
White 4 82
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 69 7
Two or More Races 18 7
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Central falls vs Taylorsville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Central falls at 8% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Taylorsville at 82% compared to 4% in Central falls.
  • In Taylorsville, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Central falls.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Central falls at 69% compared to 7% in Taylorsville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Central falls at 18% compared to 7% in Taylorsville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central falls at 1% compared to 0% in Taylorsville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Central falls Taylorsville
Mental Health Not Good 19.8% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 17.4% 12.0%
Depression 26.7% 24.1%
Smoking 22.8% 17.8%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 17.0%
Obesity 40.6% 32.5%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 40.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Central falls vs Taylorsville

  • More residents in Central falls report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 17.7% in Taylorsville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Central falls at 26.7% compared to 24.1% in Taylorsville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Central falls at 22.8% compared to 17.8% in Taylorsville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Taylorsville at 17.0% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Central falls at 40.6% compared to 32.5% in Taylorsville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 15.0% in Central falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Central falls Taylorsville
No Schooling 4.7% (1,048) 0.8% (2)
High School Diploma 15.1% (3,406) 24.8% (64)
Less than High School 44.1% (9,911) 51.2% (132)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.6% (1,270) 22.5% (58)

Education Levels Comparison: Central falls vs Taylorsville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Central falls have no formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 0.8% in Taylorsville.
  • In Taylorsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.8% compared to 15.1% in Central falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 51.2%, compared to 44.1% in Central falls.
  • In Taylorsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.