Demographics details for Central falls, RI vs Shasta lake, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central falls, RI vs Shasta lake, CA.
| Data | Central falls | Shasta lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,490 | 10,335 |
| Median Age | 31.5 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $43,092 | $54,490 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Central falls vs Shasta lake
- In Central falls, the population is higher at 22,490, compared to 10,335 in Shasta lake.
- The median age in Shasta lake is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
- Shasta lake has a higher median income of $54,490, compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
- In Shasta lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
- Central falls has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 12% in Shasta lake.
- The unemployment rate in Central falls is higher at 5.3%, compared to 5.1% in Shasta lake.
Demographics
Demographics Central falls vs Shasta lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central falls | Shasta lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | Data is updating |
| White | 4 | 74 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 69 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Central falls vs Shasta lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Central falls at 8% compared to 0% in Shasta lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shasta lake at 74% compared to 4% in Central falls.
- In Shasta lake, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Central falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central falls at 69% compared to 12% in Shasta lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Central falls at 18% compared to 11% in Shasta lake.
- In Shasta lake, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Central falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central falls | Shasta lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.4% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 26.7% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 40.6% | 32.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central falls vs Shasta lake
- More residents in Central falls report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 19.3% in Shasta lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central falls at 26.7% compared to 22.9% in Shasta lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Central falls at 22.8% compared to 17.4% in Shasta lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shasta lake at 17.5% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Central falls at 40.6% compared to 32.5% in Shasta lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shasta lake at 25.0% compared to 15.0% in Central falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central falls | Shasta lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.7% (1,048) | 0.6% (67) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (3,406) | 17.0% (1,759) |
| Less than High School | 44.1% (9,911) | 11.4% (1,176) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.6% (1,270) | 9.2% (946) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central falls vs Shasta lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Central falls have no formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 0.6% in Shasta lake.
- In Shasta lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 15.1% in Central falls.
- More residents in Central falls have less than a high school education at 44.1% compared to 11.4% in Shasta lake.
- In Shasta lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.