Demographics details for Central falls, RI vs Severna park, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central falls, RI vs Severna park, MD.
| Data | Central falls | Severna park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,490 | 40,452 |
| Median Age | 31.5 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $43,092 | $164,288 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 3% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Central falls vs Severna park
- The population in Severna park is higher at 40,452, compared to 22,490 in Central falls.
- The median age in Severna park is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
- Severna park has a higher median income of $164,288, compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
- In Severna park, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
- Central falls has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 3% in Severna park.
- The unemployment rate in Central falls is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.2% in Severna park.
Demographics
Demographics Central falls vs Severna park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central falls | Severna park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 3 |
| White | 4 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 69 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central falls vs Severna park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Central falls at 8% compared to 3% in Severna park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Severna park at 86% compared to 4% in Central falls.
- In Severna park, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Central falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central falls at 69% compared to 3% in Severna park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Central falls at 18% compared to 5% in Severna park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central falls at 1% compared to 0% in Severna park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central falls | Severna park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.4% | 7.3% |
| Depression | 26.7% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 9.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 40.6% | 31.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central falls vs Severna park
- More residents in Central falls report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 13.1% in Severna park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central falls at 26.7% compared to 19.9% in Severna park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Central falls at 22.8% compared to 9.0% in Severna park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Severna park at 18.4% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Central falls at 40.6% compared to 31.9% in Severna park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Central falls at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in Severna park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central falls | Severna park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.7% (1,048) | 0.4% (145) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (3,406) | 10.9% (4,392) |
| Less than High School | 44.1% (9,911) | 4.3% (1,731) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.6% (1,270) | 38.1% (15,411) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central falls vs Severna park
- A higher percentage of residents in Central falls have no formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 0.4% in Severna park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central falls hold a high school diploma at 15.1% compared to 10.9% in Severna park.
- More residents in Central falls have less than a high school education at 44.1% compared to 4.3% in Severna park.
- In Severna park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.