Demographics details for Central falls, RI vs Oakland park, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central falls, RI vs Oakland park, FL.
| Data | Central falls | Oakland park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,490 | 43,824 |
| Median Age | 31.5 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $43,092 | $64,989 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Central falls vs Oakland park
- The population in Oakland park is higher at 43,824, compared to 22,490 in Central falls.
- The median age in Oakland park is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
- Oakland park has a higher median income of $64,989, compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
- In Oakland park, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
- Central falls has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 14% in Oakland park.
- The unemployment rate in Central falls is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.1% in Oakland park.
Demographics
Demographics Central falls vs Oakland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central falls | Oakland park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 29 |
| White | 4 | 20 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 69 | 32 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 17 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central falls vs Oakland park
- In Oakland park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 8% in Central falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Oakland park at 20% compared to 4% in Central falls.
- In Oakland park, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Central falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central falls at 69% compared to 32% in Oakland park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Central falls at 18% compared to 17% in Oakland park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central falls at 1% compared to 0% in Oakland park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central falls | Oakland park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.4% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 26.7% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 40.6% | 31.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central falls vs Oakland park
- More residents in Central falls report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 16.3% in Oakland park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central falls at 26.7% compared to 17.8% in Oakland park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Central falls at 22.8% compared to 20.1% in Oakland park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Oakland park at 15.0% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Central falls at 40.6% compared to 31.1% in Oakland park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Central falls at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Oakland park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central falls | Oakland park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.7% (1,048) | 1.4% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (3,406) | 19.8% (8,695) |
| Less than High School | 44.1% (9,911) | 16.2% (7,092) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.6% (1,270) | 20.7% (9,073) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central falls vs Oakland park
- A higher percentage of residents in Central falls have no formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 1.4% in Oakland park.
- In Oakland park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 15.1% in Central falls.
- More residents in Central falls have less than a high school education at 44.1% compared to 16.2% in Oakland park.
- In Oakland park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.