Demographics details for Central falls, RI vs Mission, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central falls, RI vs Mission, TX.
| Data | Central falls | Mission |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,490 | 86,635 |
| Median Age | 31.5 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $43,092 | $56,421 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 6.3 |
Population Comparison: Central falls vs Mission
- The population in Mission is higher at 86,635, compared to 22,490 in Central falls.
- The median age in Mission is higher at 33.7 years, compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
- Mission has a higher median income of $56,421, compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
- In Mission, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
- The poverty level is identical in both Central falls and Mission at 20%.
- Mission has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 5.3% in Central falls.
Demographics
Demographics Central falls vs Mission provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central falls | Mission |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 1 |
| White | 4 | -29 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 69 | 88 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 37 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Central falls vs Mission
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Central falls at 8% compared to 1% in Mission.
- Central falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 4% compared to -29% in Mission.
- In Mission, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Central falls.
- Mission has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 88%, compared to 69% in Central falls.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mission at 37%, compared to 18% in Central falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Central falls and Mission at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central falls | Mission |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.4% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 26.7% | 19.0% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 14.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 40.6% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central falls vs Mission
- More residents in Central falls report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 17.0% in Mission.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central falls at 26.7% compared to 19.0% in Mission.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Central falls at 22.8% compared to 14.2% in Mission.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mission at 17.1% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
- Mission has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 40.6% in Central falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Central falls at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Mission.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central falls | Mission |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.7% (1,048) | 1.8% (1,566) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (3,406) | 11.0% (9,541) |
| Less than High School | 44.1% (9,911) | 29.1% (25,172) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.6% (1,270) | 17.1% (14,851) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central falls vs Mission
- A higher percentage of residents in Central falls have no formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 1.8% in Mission.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central falls hold a high school diploma at 15.1% compared to 11.0% in Mission.
- More residents in Central falls have less than a high school education at 44.1% compared to 29.1% in Mission.
- In Mission, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.