Demographics details for Central falls, RI vs Hospers, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central falls, RI vs Hospers, IA.
| Data | Central falls | Hospers |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,490 | 710 |
| Median Age | 31.5 years | 29.8 years |
| Median Income | $43,092 | $69,659 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 57.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Central falls vs Hospers
- In Central falls, the population is higher at 22,490, compared to 710 in Hospers.
- Residents in Central falls have a higher median age of 31.5 years compared to 29.8 years in Hospers.
- Hospers has a higher median income of $69,659, compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
- In Hospers, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
- Central falls has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 6% in Hospers.
- The unemployment rate in Central falls is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.2% in Hospers.
Demographics
Demographics Central falls vs Hospers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central falls | Hospers |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | Data is updating |
| White | 4 | 70 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 69 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Central falls vs Hospers
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Central falls at 8% compared to 0% in Hospers.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hospers at 70% compared to 4% in Central falls.
- Both Central falls and Hospers have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central falls at 69% compared to 26% in Hospers.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Central falls at 18% compared to 3% in Hospers.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Central falls and Hospers at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central falls | Hospers |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.4% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 26.7% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 21.6% |
| Obesity | 40.6% | 38.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central falls vs Hospers
- More residents in Central falls report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 14.2% in Hospers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central falls at 26.7% compared to 16.6% in Hospers.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Central falls at 22.8% compared to 15.2% in Hospers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hospers at 21.6% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Central falls at 40.6% compared to 38.1% in Hospers.
- Disability percentages are higher in Central falls at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Hospers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central falls | Hospers |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.7% (1,048) | 0.3% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (3,406) | 26.6% (189) |
| Less than High School | 44.1% (9,911) | 14.4% (102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.6% (1,270) | 11.3% (80) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central falls vs Hospers
- A higher percentage of residents in Central falls have no formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 0.3% in Hospers.
- In Hospers, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.6% compared to 15.1% in Central falls.
- More residents in Central falls have less than a high school education at 44.1% compared to 14.4% in Hospers.
- In Hospers, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.