Demographics details for Central falls, RI vs Flint, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central falls, RI vs Flint, MI.
| Data | Central falls | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,490 | 79,854 |
| Median Age | 31.5 years | 36.1 years |
| Median Income | $43,092 | $35,451 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 32% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 10.4 |
Population Comparison: Central falls vs Flint
- The population in Flint is higher at 79,854, compared to 22,490 in Central falls.
- The median age in Flint is higher at 36.1 years, compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
- Central falls has a higher median income of $43,092 compared to $35,451 in Flint.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central falls at 29.0% compared to 20.0% in Flint.
- The poverty level is higher in Flint at 32%, compared to 20% in Central falls.
- Flint has a higher unemployment rate at 10.4% compared to 5.3% in Central falls.
Demographics
Demographics Central falls vs Flint provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central falls | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 58 |
| White | 4 | 30 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 69 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central falls vs Flint
- In Flint, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 8% in Central falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Flint at 30% compared to 4% in Central falls.
- In Flint, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Central falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central falls at 69% compared to 4% in Flint.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Central falls at 18% compared to 7% in Flint.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central falls at 1% compared to 0% in Flint.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central falls | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 21.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.4% | 17.3% |
| Depression | 26.7% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 29.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 40.6% | 51.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central falls vs Flint
- In Flint, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 19.8% in Central falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central falls at 26.7% compared to 25.6% in Flint.
- Flint has a higher smoking rate at 29.5% compared to 22.8% in Central falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central falls at 14.2% compared to 14.0% in Flint.
- Flint has higher obesity rates at 51.7% compared to 40.6% in Central falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flint at 25.0% compared to 15.0% in Central falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central falls | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.7% (1,048) | 0.8% (629) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (3,406) | 20.2% (16,121) |
| Less than High School | 44.1% (9,911) | 15.3% (12,181) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.6% (1,270) | 8.3% (6,616) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central falls vs Flint
- A higher percentage of residents in Central falls have no formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 0.8% in Flint.
- In Flint, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 15.1% in Central falls.
- More residents in Central falls have less than a high school education at 44.1% compared to 15.3% in Flint.
- In Flint, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.3% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.