Demographics details for Central falls, RI vs Federalsburg, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Central falls, RI vs Federalsburg, MD.

Data Central falls Federalsburg
Population 22,490 2,806
Median Age 31.5 years 36.4 years
Median Income $43,092 $33,511
Married Families 29.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 20% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 4.5

Population Comparison: Central falls vs Federalsburg

  • In Central falls, the population is higher at 22,490, compared to 2,806 in Federalsburg.
  • The median age in Federalsburg is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
  • Central falls has a higher median income of $43,092 compared to $33,511 in Federalsburg.
  • In Federalsburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
  • Central falls has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 10% in Federalsburg.
  • The unemployment rate in Central falls is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.5% in Federalsburg.

Demographics

Demographics Central falls vs Federalsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Central falls Federalsburg
Black 8 47
White 4 38
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 69 4
Two or More Races 18 10
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Central falls vs Federalsburg

  • In Federalsburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 47% compared to 8% in Central falls.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Federalsburg at 38% compared to 4% in Central falls.
  • Both Central falls and Federalsburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Central falls at 69% compared to 4% in Federalsburg.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Central falls at 18% compared to 10% in Federalsburg.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Central falls and Federalsburg at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Central falls Federalsburg
Mental Health Not Good 19.8% 20.7%
Physical Health Not Good 17.4% 13.9%
Depression 26.7% 23.0%
Smoking 22.8% 22.8%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 12.8%
Obesity 40.6% 47.3%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Central falls vs Federalsburg

  • In Federalsburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 19.8% in Central falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Central falls at 26.7% compared to 23.0% in Federalsburg.
  • Smoking rates are the same in both Central falls and Federalsburg at 22.8%.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Central falls at 14.2% compared to 12.8% in Federalsburg.
  • Federalsburg has higher obesity rates at 47.3% compared to 40.6% in Central falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Federalsburg at 24.0% compared to 15.0% in Central falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Central falls Federalsburg
No Schooling 4.7% (1,048) 1.5% (41)
High School Diploma 15.1% (3,406) 24.5% (687)
Less than High School 44.1% (9,911) 22.2% (624)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.6% (1,270) 4.7% (131)

Education Levels Comparison: Central falls vs Federalsburg

  • A higher percentage of residents in Central falls have no formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 1.5% in Federalsburg.
  • In Federalsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 15.1% in Central falls.
  • More residents in Central falls have less than a high school education at 44.1% compared to 22.2% in Federalsburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Central falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 5.6% compared to 4.7% in Federalsburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.