Demographics details for Central falls, RI vs Claremont, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central falls, RI vs Claremont, CA.
| Data | Central falls | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,490 | 36,001 |
| Median Age | 31.5 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $43,092 | $115,091 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Central falls vs Claremont
- The population in Claremont is higher at 36,001, compared to 22,490 in Central falls.
- The median age in Claremont is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $115,091, compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
- In Claremont, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
- Central falls has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 6% in Claremont.
- Claremont has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 5.3% in Central falls.
Demographics
Demographics Central falls vs Claremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central falls | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 6 |
| White | 4 | 37 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 16 |
| Hispanic | 69 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 16 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central falls vs Claremont
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Central falls at 8% compared to 6% in Claremont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Claremont at 37% compared to 4% in Central falls.
- In Claremont, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 0% in Central falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central falls at 69% compared to 25% in Claremont.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Central falls at 18% compared to 16% in Claremont.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central falls at 1% compared to 0% in Claremont.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central falls | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 14.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.4% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 26.7% | 16.3% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 8.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 40.6% | 24.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central falls vs Claremont
- More residents in Central falls report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 14.0% in Claremont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central falls at 26.7% compared to 16.3% in Claremont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Central falls at 22.8% compared to 8.2% in Claremont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Claremont at 16.7% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Central falls at 40.6% compared to 24.5% in Claremont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Central falls at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Claremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central falls | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.7% (1,048) | 1.1% (403) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (3,406) | 6.7% (2,427) |
| Less than High School | 44.1% (9,911) | 6.2% (2,248) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.6% (1,270) | 39.5% (14,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central falls vs Claremont
- A higher percentage of residents in Central falls have no formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 1.1% in Claremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central falls hold a high school diploma at 15.1% compared to 6.7% in Claremont.
- More residents in Central falls have less than a high school education at 44.1% compared to 6.2% in Claremont.
- In Claremont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.