Demographics details for Central falls, RI vs Castle rock, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Central falls, RI vs Castle rock, CO.

Data Central falls Castle rock
Population 22,490 80,191
Median Age 31.5 years 35.8 years
Median Income $43,092 $135,985
Married Families 29.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 20% 2%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 4.1

Population Comparison: Central falls vs Castle rock

  • The population in Castle rock is higher at 80,191, compared to 22,490 in Central falls.
  • The median age in Castle rock is higher at 35.8 years, compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
  • Castle rock has a higher median income of $135,985, compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
  • In Castle rock, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
  • Central falls has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 2% in Castle rock.
  • The unemployment rate in Central falls is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.1% in Castle rock.

Demographics

Demographics Central falls vs Castle rock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Central falls Castle rock
Black 8 1
White 4 81
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 69 10
Two or More Races 18 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Central falls vs Castle rock

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Central falls at 8% compared to 1% in Castle rock.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Castle rock at 81% compared to 4% in Central falls.
  • In Castle rock, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Central falls.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Central falls at 69% compared to 10% in Castle rock.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Central falls at 18% compared to 6% in Castle rock.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central falls at 1% compared to 0% in Castle rock.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Central falls Castle rock
Mental Health Not Good 19.8% 13.3%
Physical Health Not Good 17.4% 8.5%
Depression 26.7% 19.6%
Smoking 22.8% 10.4%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 18.9%
Obesity 40.6% 24.3%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Central falls vs Castle rock

  • More residents in Central falls report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 13.3% in Castle rock.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Central falls at 26.7% compared to 19.6% in Castle rock.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Central falls at 22.8% compared to 10.4% in Castle rock.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Castle rock at 18.9% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Central falls at 40.6% compared to 24.3% in Castle rock.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Central falls at 15.0% compared to 6.0% in Castle rock.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Central falls Castle rock
No Schooling 4.7% (1,048) 0.2% (142)
High School Diploma 15.1% (3,406) 6.7% (5,389)
Less than High School 44.1% (9,911) 2.8% (2,284)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.6% (1,270) 31.8% (25,532)

Education Levels Comparison: Central falls vs Castle rock

  • A higher percentage of residents in Central falls have no formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 0.2% in Castle rock.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Central falls hold a high school diploma at 15.1% compared to 6.7% in Castle rock.
  • More residents in Central falls have less than a high school education at 44.1% compared to 2.8% in Castle rock.
  • In Castle rock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.