Demographics details for Central city, NE vs Usk, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central city, NE vs Usk, WA.
| Data | Central city | Usk |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,078 | 134 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 46.0 years |
| Median Income | $54,063 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Central city vs Usk
- In Central city, the population is higher at 3,078, compared to 134 in Usk.
- The median age in Usk is higher at 46.0 years, compared to 37.0 years in Central city.
- Usk has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $54,063 in Central city.
- In Usk, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 38.0% in Central city.
- The poverty level is higher in Usk at 12%, compared to 9% in Central city.
- Usk has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Central city vs Usk provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central city | Usk |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 86 | 90 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Central city vs Usk
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Central city and Usk at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Usk at 90% compared to 86% in Central city.
- The Asian population is larger in Central city at 3% compared to 0% in Usk.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central city at 7% compared to 5% in Usk.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Central city at 4% compared to 2% in Usk.
- In Usk, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Central city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central city | Usk |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 18.6% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central city vs Usk
- More residents in Central city report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central city at 18.6% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Central city at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central city at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
- Obesity rates are higher in Central city at 44.9% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
- Disability percentages are higher in Central city at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central city | Usk |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 23.4% (721) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (178) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.1% (404) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central city vs Usk
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Central city and Usk at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central city hold a high school diploma at 23.4% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
- More residents in Central city have less than a high school education at 5.8% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.1% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.