Demographics details for Central city, NE vs South jordan, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Central city, NE vs South jordan, UT.

Data Central city South jordan
Population 3,078 83,513
Median Age 37.0 years 34.4 years
Median Income $54,063 $119,822
Married Families 38.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 9% 5%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.7

Population Comparison: Central city vs South jordan

  • The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 3,078 in Central city.
  • Residents in Central city have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $54,063 in Central city.
  • In South jordan, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 38.0% in Central city.
  • Central city has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 2.5% in Central city.

Demographics

Demographics Central city vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Central city South jordan
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 86 83
Asian 3 4
Hispanic 7 7
Two or More Races 4 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Central city vs South jordan

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Central city and South jordan at 0%.
  • Central city has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 83% in South jordan.
  • In South jordan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Central city.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Central city and South jordan at 7%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South jordan at 5%, compared to 4% in Central city.
  • In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Central city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Central city South jordan
Mental Health Not Good 14.5% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.1% 9.0%
Depression 18.6% 26.5%
Smoking 17.5% 7.3%
Binge Drinking 20.0% 16.9%
Obesity 44.9% 28.6%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Central city vs South jordan

  • In South jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.5% in Central city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 18.6% in Central city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Central city at 17.5% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Central city at 20.0% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Central city at 44.9% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Central city at 18.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Central city South jordan
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.2% (172)
High School Diploma 23.4% (721) 8.4% (6,995)
Less than High School 5.8% (178) 2.7% (2,236)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.1% (404) 27.1% (22,648)

Education Levels Comparison: Central city vs South jordan

  • In South jordan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Central city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Central city hold a high school diploma at 23.4% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
  • More residents in Central city have less than a high school education at 5.8% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
  • In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 13.1% in Central city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.