Demographics details for Central city, NE vs Pana, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central city, NE vs Pana, IL.
| Data | Central city | Pana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,078 | 5,093 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 41.7 years |
| Median Income | $54,063 | $47,763 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Central city vs Pana
- The population in Pana is higher at 5,093, compared to 3,078 in Central city.
- The median age in Pana is higher at 41.7 years, compared to 37.0 years in Central city.
- Central city has a higher median income of $54,063 compared to $47,763 in Pana.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central city at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Pana.
- The poverty level is higher in Pana at 10%, compared to 9% in Central city.
- Pana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 2.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Central city vs Pana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central city | Pana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 86 | 93 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central city vs Pana
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Central city and Pana at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pana at 93% compared to 86% in Central city.
- The Asian population is larger in Central city at 3% compared to 1% in Pana.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central city at 7% compared to 3% in Pana.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Central city at 4% compared to 3% in Pana.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Central city and Pana at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central city | Pana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 18.6% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central city vs Pana
- In Pana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.5% in Central city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pana at 22.8% versus 18.6% in Central city.
- Pana has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 17.5% in Central city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central city at 20.0% compared to 17.5% in Pana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Central city at 44.9% compared to 39.1% in Pana.
- Disability percentages are higher in Central city at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Pana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central city | Pana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 23.4% (721) | 30.7% (1,563) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (178) | 17.1% (870) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.1% (404) | 11.0% (559) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central city vs Pana
- In Pana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Central city.
- In Pana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.7% compared to 23.4% in Central city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pana at 17.1%, compared to 5.8% in Central city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.1% compared to 11.0% in Pana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.