Demographics details for Central city, KY vs Washington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central city, KY vs Washington, NC.
| Data | Central city | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,810 | 10,828 |
| Median Age | 33.5 years | 48.0 years |
| Median Income | $52,184 | $38,927 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Central city vs Washington
- The population in Washington is higher at 10,828, compared to 5,810 in Central city.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Central city has a higher median income of $52,184 compared to $38,927 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central city at 38.0% compared to 34.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is identical in both Central city and Washington at 16%.
- Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Central city vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central city | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 49 |
| White | 88 | 41 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Central city vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 3% in Central city.
- Central city has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 41% in Washington.
- Both Central city and Washington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Central city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Central city at 6% compared to 3% in Washington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Central city and Washington at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central city | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 26.8% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 41.9% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central city vs Washington
- More residents in Central city report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.3% in Washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central city at 26.8% compared to 22.8% in Washington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Central city at 24.8% compared to 21.9% in Washington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central city at 14.8% compared to 14.7% in Washington.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 41.9% in Central city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 24.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central city | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (65) | 1.2% (128) |
| High School Diploma | 15.4% (897) | 19.0% (2,058) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (905) | 13.7% (1,487) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.3% (480) | 10.3% (1,118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central city vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.1% in Central city.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
- More residents in Central city have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 13.7% in Washington.
- In Washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.