Demographics details for Central city, KY vs Sulphur, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central city, KY vs Sulphur, OK.
| Data | Central city | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,810 | 4,951 |
| Median Age | 33.5 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $52,184 | $55,951 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Central city vs Sulphur
- In Central city, the population is higher at 5,810, compared to 4,951 in Sulphur.
- The median age in Sulphur is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Sulphur has a higher median income of $55,951, compared to $52,184 in Central city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central city at 38.0% compared to 34.0% in Sulphur.
- Central city has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 14% in Sulphur.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Central city and Sulphur at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Central city vs Sulphur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central city | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 88 | 60 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 16 |
| American Indian | 1 | 10 |
Demographics Comparison: Central city vs Sulphur
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Central city at 3% compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- Central city has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 60% in Sulphur.
- Both Central city and Sulphur have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Sulphur has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 2% in Central city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sulphur at 16%, compared to 6% in Central city.
- In Sulphur, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 10%, compared to 1% in Central city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central city | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 26.8% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 41.9% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central city vs Sulphur
- More residents in Central city report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 19.2% in Sulphur.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central city at 26.8% compared to 25.3% in Sulphur.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Central city at 24.8% compared to 21.4% in Sulphur.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central city at 14.8% compared to 14.6% in Sulphur.
- Obesity rates are higher in Central city at 41.9% compared to 40.7% in Sulphur.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sulphur at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central city | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (65) | 1.8% (88) |
| High School Diploma | 15.4% (897) | 18.2% (899) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (905) | 18.1% (898) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.3% (480) | 10.9% (542) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central city vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.1% in Central city.
- In Sulphur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur at 18.1%, compared to 15.6% in Central city.
- In Sulphur, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.