Demographics details for Central city, KY vs Pachuta, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central city, KY vs Pachuta, MS.
| Data | Central city | Pachuta |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,810 | 199 |
| Median Age | 33.5 years | 53.0 years |
| Median Income | $52,184 | $31,964 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Central city vs Pachuta
- In Central city, the population is higher at 5,810, compared to 199 in Pachuta.
- The median age in Pachuta is higher at 53.0 years, compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Central city has a higher median income of $52,184 compared to $31,964 in Pachuta.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central city at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Pachuta.
- The poverty level is higher in Pachuta at 21%, compared to 16% in Central city.
- Pachuta has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Central city vs Pachuta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central city | Pachuta |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 39 |
| White | 88 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central city vs Pachuta
- In Pachuta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 39% compared to 3% in Central city.
- Central city has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 55% in Pachuta.
- Both Central city and Pachuta have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central city at 2% compared to 0% in Pachuta.
- Both Central city and Pachuta have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central city at 1% compared to 0% in Pachuta.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central city | Pachuta |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 15.4% |
| Depression | 26.8% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 25.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 41.9% | 47.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 36.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central city vs Pachuta
- In Pachuta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 19.3% in Central city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central city at 26.8% compared to 24.7% in Pachuta.
- Pachuta has a higher smoking rate at 25.8% compared to 24.8% in Central city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central city at 14.8% compared to 12.9% in Pachuta.
- Pachuta has higher obesity rates at 47.3% compared to 41.9% in Central city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pachuta at 36.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central city | Pachuta |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (65) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.4% (897) | 16.1% (32) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (905) | 24.6% (49) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.3% (480) | 8.0% (16) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central city vs Pachuta
- A higher percentage of residents in Central city have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Pachuta.
- In Pachuta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.1% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pachuta at 24.6%, compared to 15.6% in Central city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Central city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.3% compared to 8.0% in Pachuta.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.