Demographics details for Central city, KY vs Nevada, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central city, KY vs Nevada, MO.
Data | Central city | Nevada |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,810 | 8,205 |
Median Age | 33.5 years | 38.4 years |
Median Income | $52,184 | $44,318 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Central city vs Nevada
- The population in Nevada is higher at 8,205, compared to 5,810 in Central city.
- The median age in Nevada is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Central city has a higher median income of $52,184 compared to $44,318 in Nevada.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central city at 38.0% compared to 28.0% in Nevada.
- Central city has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 14% in Nevada.
- The unemployment rate in Central city is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Nevada.
Demographics
Demographics Central city vs Nevada provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Central city | Nevada |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 1 |
White | 88 | 90 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central city vs Nevada
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Central city at 3% compared to 1% in Nevada.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Nevada at 90% compared to 88% in Central city.
- Both Central city and Nevada have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Nevada has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Central city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Central city at 6% compared to 5% in Nevada.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central city at 1% compared to 0% in Nevada.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Central city | Nevada |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 20.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 15.1% |
Depression | 26.8% | 26.7% |
Smoking | 24.8% | 26.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 41.9% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central city vs Nevada
- In Nevada, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 19.3% in Central city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central city at 26.8% compared to 26.7% in Nevada.
- Nevada has a higher smoking rate at 26.3% compared to 24.8% in Central city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Nevada at 16.1% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Central city at 41.9% compared to 38.5% in Nevada.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Nevada at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Central city | Nevada |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (65) | 1.1% (89) |
High School Diploma | 15.4% (897) | 20.8% (1,706) |
Less than High School | 15.6% (905) | 14.1% (1,155) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.3% (480) | 11.8% (972) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central city vs Nevada
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Central city and Nevada at 1.1%.
- In Nevada, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
- More residents in Central city have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 14.1% in Nevada.
- In Nevada, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.