Demographics details for Central city, KY vs Martinsdale, MT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Central city, KY vs Martinsdale, MT.

Data Central city Martinsdale
Population 5,810 37
Median Age 33.5 years 40.8 years
Median Income $52,184 $55,489
Married Families 38.0% Data is updating
Poverty Level 16% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Central city vs Martinsdale

  • In Central city, the population is higher at 5,810, compared to 37 in Martinsdale.
  • The median age in Martinsdale is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
  • Martinsdale has a higher median income of $55,489, compared to $52,184 in Central city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Central city at 38.0% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • Central city has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • The unemployment rate in Central city is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Martinsdale.

Demographics

Demographics Central city vs Martinsdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Central city Martinsdale
Black 3 Data is updating
White 88 100
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 2 Data is updating
Two or More Races 6 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Central city vs Martinsdale

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Central city at 3% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Martinsdale at 100% compared to 88% in Central city.
  • Both Central city and Martinsdale have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Central city at 2% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Central city at 6% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central city at 1% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Central city Martinsdale
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% 12.2%
Physical Health Not Good 15.5% 14.4%
Depression 26.8% 20.1%
Smoking 24.8% 16.8%
Binge Drinking 14.8% 14.5%
Obesity 41.9% 35.3%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Central city vs Martinsdale

  • More residents in Central city report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 12.2% in Martinsdale.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Central city at 26.8% compared to 20.1% in Martinsdale.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Central city at 24.8% compared to 16.8% in Martinsdale.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Central city at 14.8% compared to 14.5% in Martinsdale.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Central city at 41.9% compared to 35.3% in Martinsdale.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Martinsdale at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Central city Martinsdale
No Schooling 1.1% (65) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.4% (897) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 15.6% (905) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.3% (480) 81.1% (30)

Education Levels Comparison: Central city vs Martinsdale

  • A higher percentage of residents in Central city have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Central city hold a high school diploma at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • More residents in Central city have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • In Martinsdale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 81.1% compared to 8.3% in Central city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.