Demographics details for Central city, KY vs Eutaw, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central city, KY vs Eutaw, AL.
Data | Central city | Eutaw |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,810 | 2,803 |
Median Age | 33.5 years | 38.4 years |
Median Income | $52,184 | $33,371 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 24% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Central city vs Eutaw
- In Central city, the population is higher at 5,810, compared to 2,803 in Eutaw.
- The median age in Eutaw is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Central city has a higher median income of $52,184 compared to $33,371 in Eutaw.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central city at 38.0% compared to 25.0% in Eutaw.
- The poverty level is higher in Eutaw at 24%, compared to 16% in Central city.
- The unemployment rate in Central city is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Eutaw.
Demographics
Demographics Central city vs Eutaw provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Central city | Eutaw |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 77 |
White | 88 | 22 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 6 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central city vs Eutaw
- In Eutaw, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 77% compared to 3% in Central city.
- Central city has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 22% in Eutaw.
- Both Central city and Eutaw have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Central city at 2% compared to 1% in Eutaw.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Central city at 6% compared to 0% in Eutaw.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central city at 1% compared to 0% in Eutaw.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Central city | Eutaw |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 22.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 18.0% |
Depression | 26.8% | 21.3% |
Smoking | 24.8% | 27.0% |
Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 10.7% |
Obesity | 41.9% | 51.6% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central city vs Eutaw
- In Eutaw, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.5% compared to 19.3% in Central city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Central city at 26.8% compared to 21.3% in Eutaw.
- Eutaw has a higher smoking rate at 27.0% compared to 24.8% in Central city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Central city at 14.8% compared to 10.7% in Eutaw.
- Eutaw has higher obesity rates at 51.6% compared to 41.9% in Central city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Eutaw at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Central city | Eutaw |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (65) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 15.4% (897) | 15.6% (438) |
Less than High School | 15.6% (905) | 16.6% (464) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.3% (480) | 16.8% (470) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central city vs Eutaw
- A higher percentage of residents in Central city have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Eutaw.
- In Eutaw, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.6% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Eutaw at 16.6%, compared to 15.6% in Central city.
- In Eutaw, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.