Demographics details for Center, TX vs Eatonton, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Center, TX vs Eatonton, GA.
| Data | Center | Eatonton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,147 | 6,545 |
| Median Age | 38.2 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $57,875 | $53,870 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Center vs Eatonton
- The population in Eatonton is higher at 6,545, compared to 5,147 in Center.
- The median age in Eatonton is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 38.2 years in Center.
- Center has a higher median income of $57,875 compared to $53,870 in Eatonton.
- In Eatonton, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 36.0% in Center.
- The poverty level is identical in both Center and Eatonton at 14%.
- The unemployment rate in Center is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.9% in Eatonton.
Demographics
Demographics Center vs Eatonton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Center | Eatonton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 26 | 56 |
| White | 44 | 44 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 27 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Center vs Eatonton
- In Eatonton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 26% in Center.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Center and Eatonton at 44%.
- Both Center and Eatonton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Center at 27% compared to 0% in Eatonton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Center at 3% compared to 0% in Eatonton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Center and Eatonton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Center | Eatonton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.0% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.7% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 12.8% |
| Obesity | 44.2% | 43.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Center vs Eatonton
- More residents in Center report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 19.3% in Eatonton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Center at 24.3% compared to 20.6% in Eatonton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Center at 24.8% compared to 22.9% in Eatonton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Center at 14.6% compared to 12.8% in Eatonton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Center at 44.2% compared to 43.6% in Eatonton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Eatonton at 22.0% compared to 14.0% in Center.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Center | Eatonton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (81) | 0.2% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 24.8% (1,277) | 27.1% (1,772) |
| Less than High School | 26.6% (1,369) | 6.1% (402) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (414) | 13.7% (895) |
Education Levels Comparison: Center vs Eatonton
- A higher percentage of residents in Center have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.2% in Eatonton.
- In Eatonton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 24.8% in Center.
- More residents in Center have less than a high school education at 26.6% compared to 6.1% in Eatonton.
- In Eatonton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 8.0% in Center.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.