Demographics details for Cedarbluff, MS vs Schoharie, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cedarbluff, MS vs Schoharie, NY.

Data Cedarbluff Schoharie
Population 170 30,063
Median Age 42.0 years 45.7 years
Median Income $60,000 $71,479
Married Families 50.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 15% 7%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.9

Population Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Schoharie

  • The population in Schoharie is higher at 30,063, compared to 170 in Cedarbluff.
  • The median age in Schoharie is higher at 45.7 years, compared to 42.0 years in Cedarbluff.
  • Schoharie has a higher median income of $71,479, compared to $60,000 in Cedarbluff.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedarbluff at 50.0% compared to 43.0% in Schoharie.
  • Cedarbluff has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 7% in Schoharie.
  • The unemployment rate in Cedarbluff is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.9% in Schoharie.

Demographics

Demographics Cedarbluff vs Schoharie provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cedarbluff Schoharie
Black 25 2
White 70 89
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 2 4
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Schoharie

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedarbluff at 25% compared to 2% in Schoharie.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Schoharie at 89% compared to 70% in Cedarbluff.
  • Both Cedarbluff and Schoharie have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Schoharie has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Cedarbluff.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Schoharie at 4%, compared to 2% in Cedarbluff.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedarbluff and Schoharie at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cedarbluff Schoharie
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 11.1%
Depression Data is updating% 23.3%
Smoking Data is updating% 18.9%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 19.0%
Obesity Data is updating% 37.0%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Schoharie

  • In Schoharie, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Schoharie at 23.3% versus 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • Schoharie has a higher smoking rate at 18.9% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Schoharie at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • Schoharie has higher obesity rates at 37.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Schoharie at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cedarbluff Schoharie
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.8% (242)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 20.8% (6,267)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.3% (3,707)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.9% (5,369)

Education Levels Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Schoharie

  • In Schoharie, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • In Schoharie, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Schoharie at 12.3%, compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • In Schoharie, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.