Demographics details for Cedarbluff, MS vs Rochester, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cedarbluff, MS vs Rochester, MN.

Data Cedarbluff Rochester
Population 170 121,878
Median Age 42.0 years 36.3 years
Median Income $60,000 $83,973
Married Families 50.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 15% 11%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 2.8

Population Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Rochester

  • The population in Rochester is higher at 121,878, compared to 170 in Cedarbluff.
  • Residents in Cedarbluff have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 36.3 years in Rochester.
  • Rochester has a higher median income of $83,973, compared to $60,000 in Cedarbluff.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedarbluff at 50.0% compared to 41.0% in Rochester.
  • Cedarbluff has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 11% in Rochester.
  • The unemployment rate in Cedarbluff is higher at 5.0%, compared to 2.8% in Rochester.

Demographics

Demographics Cedarbluff vs Rochester provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cedarbluff Rochester
Black 25 9
White 70 72
Asian 1 8
Hispanic 2 6
Two or More Races 2 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Rochester

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedarbluff at 25% compared to 9% in Rochester.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Rochester at 72% compared to 70% in Cedarbluff.
  • In Rochester, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Cedarbluff.
  • Rochester has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Cedarbluff.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rochester at 5%, compared to 2% in Cedarbluff.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedarbluff and Rochester at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cedarbluff Rochester
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.9%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 8.3%
Depression Data is updating% 22.6%
Smoking Data is updating% 14.4%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 16.5%
Obesity Data is updating% 29.9%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Rochester

  • In Rochester, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Rochester at 22.6% versus 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • Rochester has a higher smoking rate at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Rochester at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • Rochester has higher obesity rates at 29.9% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rochester at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cedarbluff Rochester
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.1% (1,376)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 10.8% (13,215)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 5.5% (6,755)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 32.9% (40,147)

Education Levels Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Rochester

  • In Rochester, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • In Rochester, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.8% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rochester at 5.5%, compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • In Rochester, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.9% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.